Things are not going well for the world’s dwindling population of tigers, either in the field or in the realm of conservation discourse. The past year has witnessed a surge of debate on tiger conservation, as increasingly discouraging trends are documented and some groups propose controversial remedial measures.
In the face of these discouraging trends, controversy erupted over new proposals coming from China to initiate a legal trade in farmed tiger products preceding the 14th Conference of Parties of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), which was held in The Hague. A major source of tiger population decline has always been poaching for tiger bone, which is used in traditional Chinese medicine and is a highly coveted product.
A combination of Chinese tiger farmers, sustainable use advocates, and pro-trade groups have started calling for a controlled trade in harvested tiger products as a conservation strategy. In August, 2006, Barun Mitra, an Indian libertarian economist, wrote an editorial (‘Sell the Tiger to Save it’) in The New York Times calling for a trade-based approach to tiger conservation. While claiming that a single farmed tiger could be worth up to $40,000 in terms of products like bones and skins, Mitra observed that “for the last 30 years, the tiger has been priced at zero, while millions of dollars have been spent to protect it and prohibit trade that might in fact help save the species.” Read the rest of this entry »
