The recovery of bison in
The recovery of bison in
As touched upon in post earlier in the week on deforestation trends- and possible countermeasures- in the Amazon, a great deal of hope for tropical forest conservation is being vested in new payments for environmental services (PES) strategies. Using nascent international markets for carbon sequestration, which in some cases can be bundled with biodiversity and community development values, these market-based strategies hold great promise for creating real economic incentives for maintaining tropical forests.
A recent paper in the on-line journal Ecology and Society, however, provides a bit of a reality check for proponents of PES, and highlights some of the practical barriers that these strategies will have to overcome. The paper, aptly titled ‘When Donors Get Cold Feet: the Community Conservation Concession in Setulang (Kalimantan, Indonesia) that Never Happened’, describes the failure to implement a novel PES pilot initiative in one of Borneo’s more intact community forests.
“Action to conserve biodiversity, particularly through the creation of protected areas, is inheren
tly political.” So begins a recent paper by Professor William Adams of the
Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World. Brian Walker and David Salt. Island Press (2006).
“Whenever we pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the universe,” noted John Muir over a century ago, in one of the earlier recorded observations on the inherent complexity of life on earth. As human knowledge has accumulated and the complexity, not only of ecological systems’ biophysical components but of their social, cultural, and institutional dimensions as well, it has become increasingly apparent that our way of organizing knowledge along disciplinary boundaries- particularly the relatively hard boundary between social and natural sciences- greatly limits our understanding of the world.During the past twenty years, an ambitious group of scientists called the Resilience Alliance has emerged to try and develop a truly integrative framework for thinking about complex systems, which they tellingly refer to as ‘social ecological systems’ in recognition of the counterproductive nature of treating human and biophysical components separately. As the group’s work has grown and expanded, they have developed a web site and blog, a thick edited volume describing their ideas called Panarchy (Island Press, 2002), and an on-line scientific journal titled Ecology and Society.